Fix Frontend Failing Test: paddle - comparison.numpy.greater_equal

[ZJay07]

PR Description

Error thrown due to complex comparison, paddle does not support complex for greater equal not sure why the function was trying to do so, removing the comparison works, but not sure if it was essential to make a "complex acceptable" paddle.greater_equal

ref: https://www.paddlepaddle.org.cn/documentation/docs/en/2.2/api/paddle/greater_equal_en.html#greater-equal

Related Issue

Close #28700

Checklist

• Did you add a function?
• Did you add the tests?
• Did you run your tests and are your tests passing?
• Did pre-commit not fail on any check?
• Did you follow the steps we provided?

Socials

[github-actions]

PR Compliance Checks

Thank you for your Pull Request! We have run several checks on this pull request in order to make sure it's suitable for merging into this project. The results are listed in the following section.

Issue Reference

In order to be considered for merging, the pull request description must refer to a specific issue number. This is described in our contributing guide and our PR template.
This check is looking for a phrase similar to: "Fixes #XYZ" or "Resolves #XYZ" where XYZ is the issue number that this PR is meant to address.

Conventional Commit PR Title

In order to be considered for merging, the pull request title must match the specification in conventional commits. You can edit the title in order for this check to pass.
Most often, our PR titles are something like one of these:

• docs: correct typo in README
• feat: implement dark mode"
• fix: correct remove button behavior

Linting Errors

• Found type "null", must be one of "feat","fix","docs","style","refactor","perf","test","build","ci","chore","revert"
• No subject found

[Ishticode]

I think this was based on our goal to superset the functions. So our backends are as comprehensive as possible. I think numpy support complex comparison so perhaps its trying to copy that.

Could you possibly check that out if it matches with np. Thank you very much :)

[ZJay07]

Similar fix to #28688

[Ishticode]

Similar fix to #28688

Thanks. Similar to #28688 I would say supported dtypes can be extended here too like int8. But I can leave that for another PR. As you changes here don't touch the suppported dtypes decorators etc. As opposed to #28688.

[Ishticode]

Thanks @ZJay07 for the effort put into this fix :)