Skip to content

Conversation

@jadolg
Copy link
Owner

@jadolg jadolg commented Dec 17, 2025

I want to provide with a simple way to get the data from paginated endpoints.
This makes it so the user does not need to deal with pagination anymore.
We return an iterator of the items you are expected to iterate over.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.26%. Comparing base (0d2c6db) to head (9f6aff0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #327      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.10%   99.26%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          43       43              
  Lines        1907     2028     +121     
  Branches      107      140      +33     
==========================================
+ Hits         1890     2013     +123     
+ Misses          9        8       -1     
+ Partials        8        7       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jadolg jadolg changed the title Add base for iterator based methods [WIP] Add base for iterator based methods Dec 21, 2025
@jadolg jadolg changed the title [WIP] Add base for iterator based methods Add base for iterator based methods Jan 5, 2026
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 5, 2026

@jadolg jadolg changed the title Add base for iterator based methods Return iterators for paginated endpoints Jan 5, 2026
@jadolg jadolg merged commit 2539caf into master Jan 5, 2026
44 checks passed
@jadolg jadolg deleted the add-base-for-iterator-methods branch January 5, 2026 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants