Skip to content

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

1 Commit
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Turbopuffer vs Zilliz Cloud — Benchmark Report

A reproducible, customer-facing comparison of Turbopuffer against Zilliz Cloud Tiered and Zilliz Cloud Capacity on LAION 100 M (single-namespace) and Cohere 10 M / 1,000-tenant (multi-tenant) workloads.

Contents

  • turbopuffer_vs_zilliz_final_report.md — the report. Five sections: writes/index construction, search, single-tenant cost, multi-tenant cost, delete-consistency behavior. Every claim backed by a measured number with the operating regime spelled out.
  • reproducibility_guide.md — per-section canonical commands, VDBBench commit pin, and script paths so any published number can be re-run.

Tested on

m6i.2xlarge (8 vCPU, 32 GB RAM) in AWS us-west-2, against the same region on all three systems. Datasets pulled from the public s3://assets.zilliz.com/benchmark/ bucket.

Pricing basis

Cost tables use the TB query-billing rate empirically reconciled against an actual TB billing-dashboard reading on 2026-04-20. See § 3 of the report for per-row derivation.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors