Skip to content

Proof of concept - use vitest instead of mocha/should#2

Open
jameslounds wants to merge 12 commits intofeat/typescript-migrationfrom
proof-of-concept/vitest
Open

Proof of concept - use vitest instead of mocha/should#2
jameslounds wants to merge 12 commits intofeat/typescript-migrationfrom
proof-of-concept/vitest

Conversation

@jameslounds
Copy link
Owner

mostly a proof of concept to demonstrate what tests would look like with vitest, and what a few files might look like after bieng migrated to typescript

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jameslounds jameslounds force-pushed the proof-of-concept/vitest branch from a6d446c to ab577cb Compare December 4, 2024 12:57
fixes weirdness around `stream` and `crypto` with slightly weird `define: {"process.browser": true}` in `vite.config.ts`
@jameslounds jameslounds force-pushed the proof-of-concept/vitest branch from ab577cb to 849af2a Compare December 4, 2024 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant