Skip to content

Conversation

@0xf0xx0
Copy link
Contributor

@0xf0xx0 0xf0xx0 commented Mar 14, 2025

I noticed Secpool's blocks weren't getting recognized properly, as they now send to 2 addresses. btc-rpc-explorer only checks the first vout, and Secpools address was the second. this pr compares all vout addresses.

block: 887,784
https://bitcoinexplorer.org/block/00000000000000000000986d491b21d8e13d39b2d854d678c0d612745e831627
https://bitcoinexplorer.org/tx/df6e06d5ba9516c2f06e7d853a0586578977de3c880f2568ea1d0b3d0b1b04ca@887784

@JustinSandjon
Copy link

I noticed Secpool's blocks weren't getting recognized properly, as they now send to 2 addresses. btc-rpc-explorer only checks the first vout, and Secpools address was the second. this pr compares all vout addresses.

block: 887,784
https://bitcoinexplorer.org/block/00000000000000000000986d491b21d8e13d39b2d854d678c0d612745e831627
https://bitcoinexplorer.org/tx/df6e06d5ba9516c2f06e7d853a0586578977de3c880f2568ea1d0b3d0b1b04ca@887784

@0xf0xx0 0xf0xx0 force-pushed the better-miner-recognition branch from 75ff592 to ec78e24 Compare August 28, 2025 16:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants