Skip to content

Conversation

@shashitiwary
Copy link

this is to see jenkins file example

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Comment on lines +8 to +18
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v1
- name: Set up JDK 1.8
uses: actions/setup-java@v1
with:
java-version: 1.8
- name: Build with Maven
run: mvn -B package --file pom.xml

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {contents: read}

Copilot Autofix

AI 5 months ago

To fix the problem, we should explicitly set the permissions key in the workflow to restrict the GITHUB_TOKEN to the least privilege necessary. For a typical CI build workflow like this, read-only access to repository contents (contents: read) is sufficient, as the workflow only checks out code and builds it, without making any changes to the repository or interacting with pull requests, issues, or releases. The best place to add this is at the workflow root (top-level), so it applies to all jobs unless overridden.

Edit .github/workflows/maven.yml and add a permissions: block with contents: read at the top level, just after the name: and before on:.

Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/maven.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/maven.yml b/.github/workflows/maven.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/maven.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/maven.yml
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+permissions:
+  contents: read
 name: Java CI
 
 on: [push]
EOF
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
permissions:
contents: read
name: Java CI

on: [push]
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants