[GHA] Changed the order of workflow_dispatch's input

[jmfinelli]

To use workflow_dispatch more intuitively

No test needed

[tomjenkinson]

IMO I find the current way of listing them first more intuitive. I can approve the pull request as I don't feel so strongly about it but I like how they are now. Please can I ask for a bit of insight as to your thoughts on why it is more intuitive to add them last?

[jmfinelli]

pull_request_repo and pull_request_ref are not used very often when actions are triggered manually. Having them as the first two fields of the list is counterintuitive IMO.

[tomjenkinson]

I still prefer at the top but it's OK for me for them to move so approving

[jmfinelli]

@mmusgrov, do you mind having a look at this PR? It is a small change but I don't want to impose my point of view to the team so I was wondering if you think that moving those fields from the top to the bottom could be an improvement or not. Thanks!

[marcosgopen]

I don't have a strong preference about the proposed change, as there is no functional change I am approving.

[mmusgrov]

The changes look good