Final fix for #298 class loader issue with langchain4j#310
Merged
jGauravGupta merged 2 commits intoMar 21, 2026
Merged
Conversation
stefanofornari
changed the title
jGauravGupta
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2026
Member
|
As this is randomly reproduced, It's ok to merge this PR and evaluate for few weeks. |
Member
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should be the final fix for #298 as per langchain4j/langchain4j#4726 .
It reverts the previous fix to force the classloader, which can potentially interfere with NB module classpath handling.