Skip to content

Test#26420

Closed
lemeurherve wants to merge 3 commits intojenkinsci:masterfrom
lemeurherve:test-pr
Closed

Test#26420
lemeurherve wants to merge 3 commits intojenkinsci:masterfrom
lemeurherve:test-pr

Conversation

@lemeurherve
Copy link
Member

Not for merge, checking last packer AMIs.

Ref:

Testing done

Screenshots (UI changes only)

Before

After

Proposed changelog entries

  • human-readable text

Proposed changelog category

/label skip-changelog

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

  • The issue, if it exists, is well-described.
  • The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
  • There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
  • New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
  • New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
  • UI changes do not introduce regressions when enforcing the current default rules of Content Security Policy Plugin. In particular, new or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
  • For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
  • For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.

Desired reviewers

@mention

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

  • There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
  • Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
  • Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
  • Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
  • If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
  • If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, be a Bug or Improvement, and either the issue or pull request must be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered.

@comment-ops-bot comment-ops-bot bot added the skip-changelog Should not be shown in the changelog label Mar 6, 2026
@lemeurherve lemeurherve changed the title Test of last packer AMIs including launchable 1.121.2 Test Mar 6, 2026
@lemeurherve lemeurherve closed this Mar 6, 2026
@lemeurherve
Copy link
Member Author

lemeurherve commented Mar 6, 2026

@jenkinsci/core FTR, builds failed on corepack yarn install in this test PR based on 0d1363c until reverting to last passing master build commit 29a032b with 058249a (the initial commit of this PR 55e1497 was a dummy one removing an empty line in the Jenkinsfile)

Ref:

EDIT: reverting only 0d1363c from #26413 is enough to get a build passing.

@daniel-beck
Copy link
Member

Thanks, trying to see whether #26424 passes.

@lemeurherve lemeurherve closed this Mar 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip-changelog Should not be shown in the changelog

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants