Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving Caching logic to central file #318

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 10, 2022
Merged

Moving Caching logic to central file #318

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 10, 2022

Conversation

bartelink
Copy link
Collaborator

@bartelink bartelink commented Mar 9, 2022

Prep/cleanup in advance of #196 potentially introducing a third clone of the caching logic into the codebase

@bartelink
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@DSilence Any idea whether there's a running system out there that still relies on it? I'm thinking of removing it (i.e. this PR) 4.x unless this actually got used

@bartelink
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Caching.fs will move into EventstoreDb and be linked into EventStore and SqlStreamStore rather than living in Equinox.Core (see #196)

@DSilence
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure there is anything in prod currently relying on async implementation. Could be useful for file-based cache though (or anything network related)

@bartelink
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@DSilence hard to argue against that reasoning (even if speculative!); thanks for the nudge; reverted in 6be1b5a
I guess it also makes for there to be asynchrony here if #61 ever happens, given that's definitely Async in nature

@bartelink bartelink changed the title Remove Asyncness from Cache Moving Caching logic to central file Mar 10, 2022
@bartelink bartelink marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2022 10:29
@bartelink bartelink merged commit 6a9093d into master Mar 10, 2022
@bartelink bartelink deleted the remove-cache-async branch March 10, 2022 12:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants