Skip to content

[🐸 Frogbot] Update version of com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind to 2.18.9 - #136

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
frogbot-com.fasterxml.jackson.core_jackson-databind-f45f7676d6168df4f086876fe8dd160a
Open

[🐸 Frogbot] Update version of com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind to 2.18.9#136
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
frogbot-com.fasterxml.jackson.core_jackson-databind-f45f7676d6168df4f086876fe8dd160a

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 This automated pull request was created by Frogbot and fixes the below:

📦 Vulnerable Dependencies

Severity ID Contextual Analysis Direct Dependencies Impacted Dependency Fixed Versions
medium
Medium
CVE-2026-54515 Not Covered com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:2.18.6 com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind 2.18.6 [2.18.9]
[2.21.5]
[2.22.1]
[3.1.4]

🔖 Details

Vulnerability Details

Contextual Analysis: Not Covered
Direct Dependencies: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:2.18.6
Impacted Dependency: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:2.18.6
Fixed Versions: [2.18.9], [2.21.5], [2.22.1], [3.1.4]
CVSS V3: 5.3

jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.8.0 until 2.18.9, 2.21.5, and 3.1.4, in BeanDeserializerBase.createContextual(), per-property @JsonIgnoreProperties exclusions are applied by _handleByNameInclusion(), producing a contextual deserializer whose BeanPropertyMap has the ignored properties removed. The subsequent per-property case-insensitivity block (triggered by @jsonformat(ACCEPT_CASE_INSENSITIVE_PROPERTIES)) rebuilds from this._beanProperties (the original, unfiltered map) instead of contextual._beanProperties, then overwrites the filtered map — restoring every property _handleByNameInclusion had just removed. The ignored property becomes writable again. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.18.9, 2.21.5, and 3.1.4.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant