Skip to content

Conversation

@CohenArthur
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure that adding another latent name resolution pass is the best way to achieve that, however it's very small and easy to reason about - if properly documented, it shouldn't increase the complexity of the name resolver too much

@CohenArthur CohenArthur marked this pull request as draft February 7, 2024 14:53
@CohenArthur CohenArthur force-pushed the name-resolve-field-instantiation branch from e73ac20 to 8f30245 Compare March 9, 2024 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants