-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.5k
fix(conference) fix processing device list while initial gUM is pending #16318
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
saghul
wants to merge
2
commits into
jitsi:master
Choose a base branch
from
saghul:gumpending-devicelistchange
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+71
−72
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well looking into the code the scenario explained above seems impossible to me.
_onDeviceListChangedseems to be attached as a listener by_initDeviceListonly when the passedsetDeviceListChangeHandleristrueand the only time this method is called with parametertrueis here https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/blob/master/conference.js#L591 . At this point the tracks are already created.Why do we need this change? Am I missing something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I saw your commit comment and if the problem is that the tracks are not in Redux yet but they are created I think you should at least fix your comment above.
Also if this is the case I feel like there should be better solution!
Maybe call
_initDeviceList(true)only once the tracks are actually stored in redux instead of attaching it too early? WDYT? Or we still want to update the device list?The scenario you are describing if I understand correctly is the following:
In this case shouldn't we call the handler once more to go trough the checks and potentially modify the tracks once the local tracks are added into redux.
I see you are using the
gumPendingflags. I'm not sure if these flags are the best choice because the condition could be true also during a regular mute/unmute or replace track operation and if I understand correctly we are trying to fix something related only to the initial GUM creation, isn't it? Maybe you can use initialGUMPromise and maybe you can chain the checks for the track change related to the devices changed to the initialGUMPromise (speculating here, not sure exactly when do we resolve those).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also if the problem is that the tracks are not in redux yet maybe we should start putting tracks in redux earlier? When I was looking into the code now we add the into the store once we have connected, the conference have started and we have added the tracks to LJM. WDYT?