Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

meta: add initial GOVERNANCE.md #5040

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

Conversation

thoughtpolice
Copy link
Member

@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice commented Dec 6, 2024

After lots of discussion, we've finally achieved a draft of the governance document!

This is a draft, as it is fundamentally incomplete; that will require the election of the initial set of 5 Jujutsu Maintainers, after an open self-nomination period! Stay tuned for more on that.


This is the result of a lot of back and forth, the weekly efforts of the governance working group, currently consisting of:

  • Martin von Zweigbergk (martinvonz)
  • Waleed Khan (arxanas)
  • Emily Shaffer (nasamuffin)
  • Austin Seipp (thoughtpolice; yours truly)

Many thanks as well to emeritus member Khionu Sybiern, who helped kickstart this whole process.


@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice self-assigned this Dec 6, 2024
@PhilipMetzger
Copy link
Contributor

You forgot to add it to the website and renaming the old temporary governance.

Copy link
Contributor

@nasamuffin nasamuffin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like a solid start, and I'm glad to see other community members chiming in. Should we push this review more in the Discord starting next week, when people are likely to be back from vacationing?

@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice force-pushed the aseipp/push-xsqsllnzzswk branch from d8a09f7 to e71ca29 Compare January 2, 2025 18:56
@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2025 18:57
@nasamuffin
Copy link
Contributor

New update looks good to me, for starters. Only thing I might add is - what's the process for modifying governance.md? Do changes need to go to a maintainer vote through the regular process? Since this is a good start but fairly bare-bones, I think it's worth outlining how we intend to update it later if/when we need to.

@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice force-pushed the aseipp/push-xsqsllnzzswk branch 2 times, most recently from e9a2443 to 52fbe51 Compare January 3, 2025 03:01
@arxanas
Copy link
Contributor

arxanas commented Jan 3, 2025

Only thing I might add is - what's the process for modifying governance.md? Do changes need to go to a maintainer vote through the regular process?

I think basically we expected to use the Decision-Making process for modifying governance.md.

@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice force-pushed the aseipp/push-xsqsllnzzswk branch from 52fbe51 to b942b1b Compare January 9, 2025 22:36
Copy link
Contributor

@ilyagr ilyagr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My comments are very much a result of a first impression. I hope they'll be helpful, but I wasn't part of drafting this document, so I might be retreading discussions that already happened, or I might not be following the spirit of what people were going for at all. If they aren't helpful, I'm happy to be overruled.

@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice force-pushed the aseipp/push-xsqsllnzzswk branch from b942b1b to fcd7d7d Compare January 30, 2025 22:27
This is the result of a lot of back and forth, the weekly efforts of the
governance working group, consisting of:

- Martin von Zweigbergk (martinvonz)
- Waleed Khan (arxanas)
- Emily Shaffer (nasamuffin)
- Austin Seipp (thoughtpolice; yours truly)

Many thanks as well to emeritus member Khionu Sybiern, who helped kickstart this
whole process.

Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <[email protected]>
@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice force-pushed the aseipp/push-xsqsllnzzswk branch from fcd7d7d to c77d861 Compare January 30, 2025 22:29
@martinvonz
Copy link
Member

This was approved by the community in #5535. I think that means you can go ahead and merge this, @thoughtpolice

@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 02500e5 Feb 10, 2025
36 checks passed
@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice deleted the aseipp/push-xsqsllnzzswk branch February 10, 2025 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants