-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 752
cli: ignore $PAGER in environment
#7821
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
spectral54
wants to merge
1
commit into
jj-vcs:main
Choose a base branch
from
spectral54:kl/pager
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+20
−17
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: I think we can sensibly deprecate this in 3 releases, so currently adding a warning here may be the option before straight up removing it. I'm up making the removal processes shorter if you deem this to hard for Google.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason we need a deprecation process and multiple releases? I consider the current behavior to be a bug. The only ones who would benefit from a deprecation warning would be those that intentionally set
$PAGERto some non-lessvalue. I don't have any actual metrics, but this is likely relatively small (vanishingly small amongst the general population, but only 'relatively' small amongst early jj adopters, I'm assuming).Contrast with the number of users broken by this bug, whose first experience with
jjis that it's completely unusable and they start off with a very negative experience. We can override this at Google and never show the deprecation warning at all, so there's no pressure to shorten this time period from us. But asjjusage is growing outside of Google, I think we should have the out-of-the-box experience be the best it can be, even if it means a sudden change in behavior (a slight regression) for a small subset of current users.(Also, I'm just not sure how to even implement the deprecation warning: we can't check here because we don't know what the value of
ui.pageris going to be from the user's config; we can't check that$PAGERis set when usingui.pager, because if users follow the advice to preserve$PAGER, they'll setui.pagerto be$PAGER... what we'd need is a check when loading the user configs thatui.pagerISN'T set in that config layer but IS set in$PAGER; I don't know if we have anything like that kind of logic already)