Add burner-bouncer to disposable email tools list#102
Open
grocerysushi wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Project
burner-bouncer
Checklist
Add burner-bouncerWhy This Project Is Awesome
burner-bouncer solves a common but overlooked problem — disposable email detection — with zero runtime dependencies, no API calls, and a bundled blocklist of 629 real domains. Ships as both an npm package (TypeScript, ESM + CJS) and a Python package with an identical API.
Which criterion does it meet? (pick one)
Explain:
How It Differs
Most email validation libraries focus on format checking. burner-bouncer specifically targets disposable/burner domains and is the only library to ship the same API in both JavaScript and Python backed by a single shared community-maintained blocklist. If similar entries exist, what makes this one unique?