Skip to content

Update VMix.ts #800

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

Christoph111
Copy link

reacts to ACTS commands, e.g. "ACTS Overlay1" so vMix Listener Devices work correctly (e.g. Hollyland Wireless Tally System)

response 0 ist static, because the tally status is already handled by tallyArbiter so no need to check for overlay status again.

be aware if you´re running vMix and TallyArbiter on the same machine, there will be a conflict where hollyland will connect to, so make sure to run tallyarbiter on a different computer. But since Hollyland directly works with vMix and does this great, if you only use vMix there is no need for tallyArbiter for hollyland tally system.

reacts to ACTS commands, e.g. "ACTS Overlay1" so vMix Listener Devices work correctly (e.g. Hollyland Wireless Tally System)


response 0 ist static, because the tally status is already handled by tallyArbiter so no need to check for overlay status again.

be aware if you´re running vMix and TallyArbiter on the same machine, there will be a conflict where hollyland will connect to, so make sure to run tallyarbiter on a different computer. But since Hollyland directly works with vMix and does this great, if you only use vMix there is no need for tallyArbiter for hollyland tally system.
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello there Christoph111 👋

Thank you for opening your first PR for the Tally Arbiter project!

We will review it soon!

TallyArbiter fosters an open and welcoming environment for all our contributors. Please adhere to our Code Of Conduct.

Copy link
Collaborator

@MatteoGheza MatteoGheza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sadly the project is not as maintaned as before, but it's always great to see some good contributions.
I can't test it but LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants