Skip to content

docs: clarify intent of format-assertion vocabulary test cases #854

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Anshikakalpana wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docs: clarify intent of format-assertion vocabulary test cases #854

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions tests/draft2020-12/optional/format-assertion.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
[
{
"description": "schema that uses custom metaschema with format-assertion: false",
"comment": "The true/false boolean in $vocabulary only controls behavior for implementations that do not recognize the vocabulary. For implementations that do understand format-assertion, the boolean has no impact on validation behavior — hence both test groups produce identical results.",
"schema": {
"$id": "https://schema/using/format-assertion/false",
"$schema": "http://localhost:1234/draft2020-12/format-assertion-false.json",
Expand All @@ -14,6 +15,7 @@
},
{
"description": "format-assertion: false: invalid string",
"comment": "valid: false is intentional — the false value in $vocabulary only affects unknown vocabulary handling, not validation behavior itself",
"data": "not-an-ipv4",
"valid": false
}
Expand Down
Loading