Skip to content

Conversation

@fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Sep 12, 2025

perf: file manager

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team September 12, 2025 09:45
handleCreateFolder,
handleRefreshFileList,
};
};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code seems correct with minimal irregularity or potential issues detected. It appears to be well-organized, contains clear logic, and uses appropriate TypeScript syntax.

To address optimization suggestions and improve readability:

  1. Move imports into their own lines within @@ section (import { v4 as uuid } from 'uuid';) instead of being indented like an import statement next after the first non-exported line. This makes it easier for readers who might come later to understand this code snippet. For instance:
// Moved import statements out of the code they belong to
  1. Use consistent spacing around operators such as =. For example:
ID = $id;
...
{
  ID;
}

... 
{
  ID: id; // OR
  ID: '$id';
};

This can make the code more readable. However, there's no actual issue because you're not making modifications in a way that would result in errors. So these points should stay as is unless some other context-specific requirement changes how whitespace is used.

For additional improvements, consider updating any version numbers if necessary based on the time frame of this question. Remember, I only checked for updates up until September 1, 2021 when you wrote your answer.

If any particular part of the code needs more detail or debugging assistance, remember that you'll need full access to both the original codebase and the environment in which it runs for detailed analysis.

width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
</style>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet appears to be TypeScript code related to Vue components, specifically the layout for a file management application. Here are some observations and comments:

  1. The component uses useNFlexible library that does not seem imported in line with its usage.
  2. The column data of the DataTable is initialized outside the watch effect because it's not used or updated within said action.
  3. Watch effects might not be necessary due to event bindings (though this can depend significantly on the specific requirements).
  4. It seems there are multiple places where CSS styles could be merged into one common scss files.

In terms of actual content:

  • There are no known syntax errors in the given script block.
  • No issues found regarding functionality.
  • Some optimization opportunities exist including moving the styling to external SCSS files and merging them later during development phase.
  • The watch mechanism for fileManageStore needs attention since its watch doesn't trigger when initial state changes; additional cleanup methods might need implementation after initialization has been completed.


window.URL.revokeObjectURL(url);
document.body.removeChild(a);
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The first code appears to be using a slightly different method of creating a download link, while the second one doesn't contain any relevant differences. Additionally, it has an unnecessary window import that seems unrelated and could potentially clutter your file without providing clear utility (although this isn't part of what you're asking about directly). So based on these observations, there are no notable differences between them. Both versions seem fine from my knowledge cutoff point except for the use of window.URL.createObjectURL() which will likely only work at certain web sites depending on browser configuration or whether CORS restrictions allow access. For best practices, consider checking if it's cross-browser compatible across all browsers and ensuring it adheres strictly to modern web standards such as being fully supported in major web browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc.

However, I would not make a formal suggestion here because they appear identical up until their differences, making further optimizations redundant given they don't differ significantly beyond minor stylistic aspects. Nonetheless, for anyone with more sophisticated needs, you might also want to look into async/await features where appropriate since some tasks may indeed benefit greatly from asynchronous handling:

Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    setTimeout(() => resolve("success"), 400);

    setTimeout(() => {
        // Your awaitable task
    }, 88); 

This is highly simplified though. A real implementation would include error management, context managers, promises, timeouts, etc depending heavily onto actual use case scenario.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants