-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
enumToStr #325
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
GreyCat
wants to merge
2
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
enum_to_s
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
enumToStr #325
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will only work for known/defined enum values, but fail for unknown enum values, which are represented as
intin Python and thus won't have the.nameattribute.Since we use
IntEnumas the base class for the enums, it isn't super simple to implement this in a way that works for both known and unknown enum values.str(enum_val)will always give you the stringified integer value, sinceIntEnumtries to be compatible withint. This is nicely explained in https://docs.python.org/3/library/enum.html#notes:Actually, we'll want to override
__str__with our own implementation so that it returns just the member name without the enum name as a prefix (likeenum.Enum.__str__does), as shown in the example for https://docs.python.org/3/library/enum.html#enum.Enum.__str__:Then the compiler can translate the
enum_val.to_ssimply asstr(enum_val)and it will return the enum member name for known values and stringified integer for unknown values.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's an interesting design question.
Up until now, we've respected per-language design, which pretty much boils down to some languages retaining existing undeclared integer value (e.g. C/C++, JavaScript, Python), and some (e.g. Java or Ruby) having no default way to keep it stored:
nullon invalid enums — and it's rather hard to do anything about thatnilin its current implementation we have — but, to be fair, we can influence that.This pretty much means that if we'll try to validate it with tests, we won't get consistent results.
I can think of 3 possible choices here for handling invalid enum values:
<UNKNOWN>or<INVALID>for all languages.unknown(123)unknown()If we'll do (2) or (3) — we can make the test: (2) with equality, (3) with something like "starts with
unknown(".Any preferences?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note, that for Java this is implemented in #288