-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 929
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Priority and PreemptionPolicy fields in ResourceBinding #5963
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5963 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 48.12% 48.11% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 668 668
Lines 55291 55291
==========================================
- Hits 26607 26604 -3
- Misses 26949 26952 +3
Partials 1735 1735
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
6b8fdc4
to
9ceb28b
Compare
9ceb28b
to
787679a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/assign
// PreemptionPolicy controls the preemption policy of this binding. | ||
// Valid values are: | ||
// - Never: (default) prevents the binding from preempting other bindings | ||
// - PreemptLowerPriority: allows the binding to preempt lower-priority bindings | ||
// +kubebuilder:default=Never | ||
// +kubebuilder:validation:Enum=Never;PreemptLowerPriority | ||
// +optional | ||
PreemptionPolicy PreemptionPolicy `json:"preemptionPolicy,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about removing the PreemptionPolicy
this time? As we are not going to implement this in this release.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make sense, I removed the preemption part.
787679a
to
d270005
Compare
Signed-off-by: wei-chenglai <[email protected]>
d270005
to
bc6b042
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: RainbowMango The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind api-change
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add SchedulePriority, Priority, and PreemptionPolicy fields in ResourceBinding to support priority-based scheduling. This enables:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #5961
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: