-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Add complete interpreter test coverage for kubeflow.org - v1 - TFJob #7079
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: zhoujinyu <[email protected]>
Summary of ChangesHello @FAUST-BENCHOU, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the test suite for the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request significantly improves the test coverage for the kubeflow.org/v1/TFJob resource interpreter by adding comprehensive test suites for status aggregation, component interpretation, dependency interpretation, and health checks. The new test cases cover a wide range of scenarios, including various replica types, edge cases like nil or empty fields, and different cluster states. The overall quality of the changes is high. I have one suggestion to further enhance the completeness of the dependency interpretation tests.
| kind: Secret | ||
| name: tfjob-secret | ||
| namespace: default | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test coverage for dependency interpretation is very comprehensive. For even greater completeness, consider adding a test case for dependencies defined within initContainers. This would ensure that the interpreter correctly discovers dependencies from all parts of the pod template.
---
name: "TFJob with dependencies in initContainers"
description: "Test interpreting dependency of TFJob with dependencies in initContainers"
desiredObj:
apiVersion: kubeflow.org/v1
kind: TFJob
metadata:
name: tfjob-init-deps
namespace: default
spec:
tfReplicaSpecs:
Worker:
replicas: 1
restartPolicy: Never
template:
spec:
initContainers:
- name: setup
image: busybox
command: ["sh", "-c", "echo 'init'"]
env:
- name: INIT_CONFIG
valueFrom:
configMapKeyRef:
name: init-config
key: data
containers:
- image: kubeflow/tf-dist-mnist-test:latest
name: tensorflow
operation: InterpretDependency
output:
dependencies:
- apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
name: init-config
namespace: default
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7079 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 46.55% 46.55% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 700 700
Lines 48091 48091
==========================================
- Hits 22389 22387 -2
- Misses 24020 24021 +1
- Partials 1682 1683 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
XiShanYongYe-Chang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks
/lgtm
/approve
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: XiShanYongYe-Chang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #6952
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: