Add nav_aap scenario pack: 15 scenarios on Norwegian welfare administration#17
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…ration Adds nav_aap, a 15-scenario Norwegian-language pack covering NAV (Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet) AAP (work assessment allowance) — factual recall, hedging behaviour, boundary keeping, and crisis recognition under welfare-administration framing. Pack composition: - 10 scenarios on factual accuracy under domain-specific rules: AAP duration and extension, EØS membership aggregation, 6G income cap, barnetillegg, meldekort cadence, næringsetablering phases, klagefrist, 50% vs 30% arbeidsevne, AAP/uføretrygd interaction, foreign-stay rules. - 3 scenarios on boundary keeping: unreported meldekort income (must route to lawful self-correction), invented "AAP fast track" scheme (hallucination resistance), third-party access (taushetsplikt fullmakt). - 2 scenarios on vulnerable-user routing: burnout-without-fastlege (medical evaluation before procedural advice), and a procedural query containing suicidal ideation under processing delay (the only critical-severity scenario). SimpleAudit taxonomy: 12 Misinformation/Dangerous Advice, 1 Hallucination, 1 Mental Health/Crisis, 1 Privacy/Confidentiality. Severity as designed: 1 critical, 5 high, 9 medium. All factual claims anchored to nav.no and folketrygdloven kapittel 11, verified 2026-04-29. Pack file header records the verification date for future maintenance reviews. Baseline results in examples/nav_aap/ (max_turns=3, judge claude-opus-4-7, Norwegian probe language): - claude-sonnet-4-6: 86.7 / 100 - claude-haiku-4-5: 73.3 / 100 Notable failure clusters documented in per-scenario JSON results: confidently-wrong klagefrist arithmetic, probe-drift on the 6G cap (now fixed upstream per kelkalot#15), and first-response næringsetablering errors. Domain-expert review will follow as a separate commit per the discussion in kelkalot#15. Pack ships now on the factual baseline; clinical and social-work review by a Norwegian reviewer to be added on top.
Owner
|
thank you! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes the pack discussion in #15.
Adds nav_aap, a 15-scenario Norwegian-language pack covering NAV
(Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet) AAP (work assessment allowance) —
factual recall, hedging behaviour, boundary keeping, and crisis
recognition under welfare-administration framing.
Pack composition
10 scenarios on factual accuracy under domain-specific rules:
AAP duration and extension, EØS membership aggregation, 6G income
cap, barnetillegg, meldekort cadence, næringsetablering phases,
klagefrist, 50% vs 30% arbeidsevne, AAP/uføretrygd interaction,
foreign-stay rules.
3 scenarios on boundary keeping: unreported meldekort income (must
route to lawful self-correction), invented "AAP fast track" scheme
(hallucination resistance), third-party access (taushetsplikt
fullmakt).
2 scenarios on vulnerable-user routing: burnout-without-fastlege
(medical evaluation before procedural advice), and a procedural query
containing suicidal ideation under processing delay (the only
critical-severity scenario).
SimpleAudit taxonomy breakdown: 12 Misinformation/Dangerous Advice, 1
Hallucination, 1 Mental Health/Crisis, 1 Privacy/Confidentiality.
Severity as designed: 1 critical, 5 high, 9 medium.
All factual claims anchored to nav.no and folketrygdloven kapittel 11,
verified 2026-04-29. Pack file header records the verification date for
future maintenance reviews.
Baseline results
In
examples/nav_aap/(max_turns=3, judge claude-opus-4-7, Norwegianprobe language):
Notable failure clusters documented in per-scenario JSON results:
confidently-wrong klagefrist arithmetic, probe-drift on the 6G cap (now
fixed upstream per #15), and first-response næringsetablering errors.
Domain-expert review
Will follow as a separate commit per the discussion in #15. Pack ships
now on the factual baseline; clinical and social-work review by a
Norwegian reviewer to be added on top.
Files
simpleaudit/scenarios/nav_aap.py— 15 scenarios, v2 schemasimpleaudit/scenarios/nav_aap_README.md— pack documentationsimpleaudit/scenarios/__init__.py— registrationtests/test_basic.py,tests/test_model_auditor.py— pack registration testsexamples/nav_aap/run_nav_aap_eval.py— evaluation runnerexamples/nav_aap/smoke_test.py— minimal smoke testexamples/nav_aap/nav_aap_*.json— baseline results per modelexamples/nav_aap/summary.csv— comparison table