fix: fix a bug when elastic as a provider

[SandeepD2697]

fixes a bug for #3727

Hey @mowies @odubajDT there is a small bug when using elastic as a provider. Previously we have not included the provider info now I have modified to include it. Can you please have a look at this? It is a continuation of the PR #3890

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 44.44444% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.37%. Comparing base (deeb73e) to head (ef98f75).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...or/controllers/common/providers/elastic/elastic.go	44.44%	4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3904      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.39%   77.37%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         220      220              
  Lines       11703    11708       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         9057     9059       +2     
- Misses       2279     2281       +2     
- Partials      367      368       +1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...or/controllers/common/providers/elastic/elastic.go	47.15% <44.44%> (-0.31%)	⬇️

Flag	Coverage Δ
certificate-operator	47.44% <ø> (ø)
component-tests	57.08% <ø> (ø)
lifecycle-operator	79.68% <ø> (ø)
metrics-operator	74.93% <44.44%> (-0.05%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[SandeepD2697]

@mowies Can you please have a look at this when you got a few min

[SandeepD2697]

@mowies @odubajDT since we will be using elastic url to test this deployment in our organization will you be releasing a new version of Keptn with this changes included?

[mowies]

We are still waiting for another bugfix before we do another release, but you can either build the image yourself for now and use that to test that everything works, or I can also provide you with an image.

[SandeepD2697]

Can you please provide us with the image. We will try it out with it

[mowies]

i pushed the new image here: https://github.com/users/mowies/packages/container/package/metrics-operator
there's one for amd64 and one for arm64.
you should be able to set the image and tag using the follow Helm values:

metricsOperator.image.registry: ghcr.io
metricsOperator.image.repository: mowies/metrics-operator
metricsOperator.image.tag: v2.1.1-next.0-<amd64 or arm64>