Skip to content

Conversation

@laxmareddyp
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @laxmareddyp, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've implemented a comprehensive guide on building a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline using KerasHub models for brain MRI analysis. This guide demonstrates how to retrieve similar medical images and generate detailed diagnostic reports, showcasing the benefits of RAG over traditional Vision-Language Models for domain-specific tasks.

Highlights

  • RAG Pipeline for Brain MRI Analysis: I've added a new guide that implements a complete RAG pipeline for analyzing brain MRI images, focusing on image retrieval, context-aware report generation, and comparison with traditional VLM approaches.
  • Integration of KerasHub Models: The guide showcases the use of various KerasHub models, including MobileNetV3 for image feature extraction and Gemma3 (1B and 4B variants) for text generation and benchmarking.
  • Medical Data Handling and Visualization: I've included utilities for preparing and visualizing real brain MRI data from the OASIS dataset, demonstrating practical application in a medical context.
  • Performance Comparison and RAG Advantages: The guide provides a clear comparison between the RAG pipeline and a direct VLM approach, emphasizing RAG's superior accuracy, efficiency, scalability, and interpretability for domain-specific tasks.
  • Code and Documentation Formats: The new content is provided as a Jupyter notebook (.ipynb), a runnable Python script (.py), and a Markdown guide (.md), ensuring accessibility and ease of use across different platforms.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@laxmareddyp laxmareddyp marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2025 22:09
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Warning

Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting /gemini review.

@divyashreepathihalli divyashreepathihalli merged commit dc57948 into keras-team:master Aug 9, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants