feature: update dependencies and relax version constraints (#47) #48
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pyproject.tomlis excluded by!**/*.toml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
requirements.txt(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
requirements.txt (2)
6-7: LGTM! Good approach with minimum version constraintsThe minimum version constraints for
typing-extensionsandfrozendictare well-defined, allowing for updates while maintaining stability.
8-8: Verify certifi version constraintThe minimum version specified for
certifi(>=2024.7.4) appears to be from a future date (July 2024). This might be a typo or could cause installation issues.Let's verify the current stable version:
Please confirm if this is the correct version or adjust it to the current stable version.
✅ Verification successful
Version constraint for certifi is valid
The specified version constraint
>=2024.7.4is correct and will allow installation of the current stable version (2024.12.14) and future updates.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check current stable version of certifi curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/certifi/json" | jq -r '.info.version'Length of output: 77
requirements.txt
Outdated
| python-dateutil # https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil | ||
| Authlib # https://github.com/lepture/authlib | ||
| pyjwt # https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt | ||
| requests # https://github.com/psf/requests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update minimum version constraints based on latest security patches
The review comment's concern is valid and supported by recent security advisories. Here are the minimum recommended versions based on latest security patches:
-urllib3 # https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3
-python-dateutil # https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil
-Authlib # https://github.com/lepture/authlib
-pyjwt # https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt
-requests # https://github.com/psf/requests
+urllib3>=2.2.2 # https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3
+python-dateutil>=2.9.0 # https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil
+Authlib>=1.3.1 # https://github.com/lepture/authlib
+pyjwt>=2.10.1 # https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt
+requests>=2.32.0 # https://github.com/psf/requestsThese constraints ensure you get the latest security fixes while allowing compatible updates.
🔗 Analysis chain
Add minimum version constraints for critical dependencies
Removing all version constraints for critical dependencies like urllib3, python-dateutil, Authlib, pyjwt, and requests could lead to compatibility issues and potential security vulnerabilities. While relaxing constraints is good, completely removing them might cause problems when new major versions are released with breaking changes.
Let's verify the latest stable versions and any known security advisories:
Recommendation: Add minimum version constraints (>=) based on the current working versions while allowing for compatible updates:
-urllib3 # https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3
-python-dateutil # https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil
-Authlib # https://github.com/lepture/authlib
-pyjwt # https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt
-requests # https://github.com/psf/requests
+urllib3>=2.2.1 # https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3
+python-dateutil>=2.9.0 # https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil
+Authlib>=1.3.0 # https://github.com/lepture/authlib
+pyjwt>=2.8.0 # https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt
+requests>=2.32.0 # https://github.com/psf/requests🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check latest versions and security advisories for critical dependencies
for pkg in urllib3 python-dateutil authlib pyjwt requests; do
echo "=== $pkg ==="
# Get latest version from PyPI
curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/$pkg/json" | jq -r '.info.version'
# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query="
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 3, ecosystem: PIP, package: \"$pkg\") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}"
done
Length of output: 5088
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
requirements.txt (1)
6-7: Consider including patch versions for consistency.While the minimum version constraints are valid, consider using complete version numbers (including patch version) for consistency with other dependencies:
-typing-extensions>=4.11 -frozendict>=2.4 +typing-extensions>=4.11.0 +frozendict>=2.4.0
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
requirements.txt(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
requirements.txt (3)
1-1: LGTM! Version constraint is secure and well-formatted.The minimum version constraint for urllib3 matches security recommendations.
2-5: LGTM! Core dependencies are properly constrained.The minimum version constraints for core dependencies are secure and consistently formatted. Repository links are properly maintained.
1-8: Overall dependency updates look good.The changes successfully:
- Update to secure minimum versions
- Relax version constraints appropriately
- Maintain documentation with repository links
The only minor suggestion is to standardize version number format across all dependencies.
requirements.txt
Outdated
| typing-extensions>=4.11 # https://github.com/python/typing_extensions | ||
| frozendict>=2.4 # https://github.com/Marco-Sulla/python-frozendict | ||
| certifi>=2024.7.4 # https://github.com/certifi/python-certifi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update certifi to latest version 2024.12.14
While version 2024.7.4 is secure against all known vulnerabilities, it's recommended to update to the latest version 2024.12.14 to stay current with the most recent root certificate updates.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify latest certifi version.
Let's verify if 2024.7.4 is the latest secure version of certifi.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check latest version and security advisories for certifi
echo "=== certifi ==="
# Get latest version from PyPI
curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/certifi/json" | jq -r '.info.version'
# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 3, ecosystem: PIP, package: "certifi") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 1143
|
Tested and works fine |
|
The last set of changes broke the unit tests. Please can you investigte |
feat: update dependencies and relax version constraints (#47)
requirements.txtandpyproject.tomlto allow for more flexible compatibility.pip-audit