Skip to content

Conversation

avi-biton
Copy link
Contributor

@avi-biton avi-biton commented Sep 18, 2025

rename proxy namespace to caching

Author's Checklist

  • I understand the problem that the PR is trying to address.
  • I understand the solution and its role and impact within the wider system.
  • I opted for automation and automated tests over documenting multiple steps.

Reviewer's Guide

  • What is the PR trying to solve?
  • Does the solution make sense?
  • How does this affect the wider system?
  • Is it being tested properly?
  • Does it keep documentation concise and maintainable?

renamed proxy namespace to caching

Signed-off-by: Avi Biton <[email protected]>
@avi-biton avi-biton requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2025 12:12
@avi-biton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Comment on lines +10 to +11
# Squid Caching Metrics
- job_name: 'squid-caching'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need to change all the internal mentions of proxy over to caching like this. Changing just the namespace would be my preference.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants