Skip to content

Management typed models improvements - #19

Open
pokornyd wants to merge 5 commits into
vnextfrom
management-typed-models
Open

Management typed models improvements#19
pokornyd wants to merge 5 commits into
vnextfrom
management-typed-models

Conversation

@pokornyd

@pokornyd pokornyd commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation

Which issue does this fix? Fixes #issue number

If no issue exists, what is the fix or new feature? Were there any reasons to fix/implement things that are not obvious?

Checklist

  • Code follows coding conventions held in this repo
  • Automated tests have been added
  • Tests are passing
  • Docs have been updated (if applicable)
  • Temporary settings (e.g. variables used during development and testing) have been reverted to defaults

How to test

If manual testing is required, what are the steps?

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 86.44068% with 24 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.68%. Comparing base (18a2834) to head (216c4a9).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on vnext.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...agement/Conversion/ContentItemEnvelopeConverter.cs 85.56% 5 Missing and 9 partials ⚠️
...anagement/Extensions/ManagementClientExtensions.cs 54.54% 4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
....Ai.Management/ManagementClient.LanguageVariant.cs 88.88% 0 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...Management/Conversion/ContentItemTypeDescriptor.cs 92.30% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            vnext      #19      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.74%   90.68%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         509      509              
  Lines       10042     9972      -70     
  Branches      947      949       +2     
==========================================
- Hits         9113     9043      -70     
+ Misses        606      594      -12     
- Partials      323      335      +12     
Flag Coverage Δ
aspnetcore 90.68% <86.44%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
delivery 90.68% <86.44%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
management 90.68% <86.44%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
model-generator 90.68% <86.44%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
sync 90.68% <86.44%> (-0.07%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...s/LanguageVariants/LanguageVariantModel{TModel}.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...elGenerator.Core/Common/ManagementElementInputs.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
....Core/Services/ManagementElementMetadataAdapter.cs 85.71% <100.00%> (+0.52%) ⬆️
...enerator.Core/Services/ManagementElementService.cs 92.45% <100.00%> (+0.45%) ⬆️
...Management/Conversion/ContentItemTypeDescriptor.cs 90.90% <92.30%> (+0.28%) ⬆️
....Ai.Management/ManagementClient.LanguageVariant.cs 89.17% <88.88%> (-1.60%) ⬇️
...anagement/Extensions/ManagementClientExtensions.cs 72.61% <54.54%> (-2.73%) ⬇️
...agement/Conversion/ContentItemEnvelopeConverter.cs 84.74% <85.56%> (-4.19%) ⬇️

... and 22 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant