⚡ Optimize string concatenation in blankFormat #127
Conversation
Replaced inefficient loop-based string concatenation with strings.Repeat. Added a check for zero arguments to prevent panic. Benchmark results show significant performance improvement: Before: ~1245 ns/op, 3 allocs/op After: ~476 ns/op, 1 allocs/op
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Optimized
blankFormatinglg.goby replacing a manual string concatenation loop withstrings.Repeat. This reduces allocations from O(N) to O(1) (specifically 1 allocation for the repeated string).Also fixed a bug where calling
glg.Log()with no arguments would cause a panic due to invalid slice indexing (df[:-1]).Benchmarks with 200 arguments showed a ~62% reduction in execution time and reduced allocations from 3 to 1 per call.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 5620460785548072003 started by @kpango