Skip to content

Create the charter for Kubeflow Community Distribution committee#951

Draft
juliusvonkohout wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
distribution-commitee
Draft

Create the charter for Kubeflow Community Distribution committee#951
juliusvonkohout wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
distribution-commitee

Conversation

@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added the charter for the Kubeflow Community Distribution committee, detailing its scope, roles, and collaboration expectations.
@kubeflow/kubeflow-steering-committee

Added the charter for the Kubeflow Community Distribution committee, detailing its scope, roles, and collaboration expectations.

Signed-off-by: Julius von Kohout <45896133+juliusvonkohout@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-oss-prow
Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from juliusvonkohout. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@juliusvonkohout juliusvonkohout changed the title Create charter for Kubeflow Community Distribution committee Create the charter for Kubeflow Community Distribution committee Apr 24, 2026
Comment thread KUBEFLOW_DISTRIBUTION_COMMITTEE.md Outdated
juliusvonkohout and others added 2 commits April 26, 2026 13:19
Co-authored-by: Helber Belmiro <helber.belmiro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julius von Kohout <45896133+juliusvonkohout@users.noreply.github.com>
Added introductory statement about the committee's purpose.

Signed-off-by: Julius von Kohout <45896133+juliusvonkohout@users.noreply.github.com>

- The Kubeflow Community Distribution is a committee dedicated to provide a tested and integrated platform experience for the Kubeflow community.
The governance of the Kubeflow Community Distribution committee will evolve as the community grows, ensuring that the platform remains relevant and impactful.
- Promote the vision, values, and mission of the Kubeflow project in collaboration with the KSC, KOC, and WG Leads.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be part of the Charter, like for KOC and KSC: https://github.com/kubeflow/community/blob/master/KUBEFLOW-OUTREACH-COMMITTEE.md


Kubeflow's [governance model](https://github.com/kubeflow/community/blob/master/wgs/wg-governance.md) includes a plethora of different leadership roles and is quite complex and designed for larger committes. This section aims to set requirements and expectations regarding tasks, roles and promotions.

**Subproject Owner**, **Technology Lead** or **Chair** roles were defined by trying
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be technical lead?

Comment on lines +32 to +33
- Aid the kubeflow project maintainer regarding security best practices.
- Communicate with the kubeflow project maintainer regarding releases and versioning.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO security and releases should be separate

- Improve the ease of deployment, packaging, and distribution of Kubeflow sub-projects across heterogenous environments.
- Empower external organizations to adopt, integrate, and build upon Kubeflow sub-projects within their own distributions.

## Scope
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks comprehensive. I wonder if there should be clearer separation of responsibilities with other committees. Otherwise this committee will be overwhelmed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants