-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 458
add dad e2e #5146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add dad e2e #5146
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @changluyi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request adds a new end-to-end test case to verify IPv6 connectivity to node IPs when a pod starts immediately. It also includes changes to the daemon to wait for IPv6 addresses to reach a preferred state before proceeding with further configuration. Specifically, the changes in pkg/daemon/ovs_linux.go
ensure that the system waits for IPv6 addresses to become preferred, checking for deprecated, DAD failed, or tentative states. The new test case in test/e2e/kube-ovn/underlay/underlay.go
creates a pod that pings the IPv6 address of a node and verifies that the pod reaches a running state, indicating successful connectivity.
Highlights
- IPv6 DAD Check: The pull request introduces a mechanism to check the state of IPv6 addresses, ensuring they are in a preferred state (not deprecated, DAD failed, or tentative) before proceeding with network configuration.
- New E2E Test: A new end-to-end test case is added to verify IPv6 connectivity to node IPs when a pod starts immediately.
- Daemon Changes: The daemon is modified to include a function
waitIPv6AddressPreferred
that waits for IPv6 addresses to become preferred before continuing with the configuration.
Changelog
- pkg/daemon/ovs_linux.go
- Added a check for IPv6 address preferred state before proceeding with network configuration.
- Introduced the
waitIPv6AddressPreferred
function to wait for IPv6 addresses to become preferred. - Removed the redundant IPv6 DAD check that was previously performed after gateway check.
- test/e2e/kube-ovn/underlay/underlay.go
- Added a new end-to-end test case to verify IPv6 connectivity to node IPs when a pod starts immediately.
- The test creates a provider network, VLAN, and subnet with IPv6 enabled.
- The test then creates a pod that pings the IPv6 address of a node and verifies that the pod reaches a running state.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
IPv6 takes its time,
DAD must pass, a crucial climb,
Preferred state we seek,
For packets to speak,
Connectivity, in its prime.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request introduces IPv6 DAD (Duplicate Address Detection) checks and improves IPv6 address handling. It also adds an end-to-end test to verify IPv6 connectivity. The changes are well-structured and address an important aspect of IPv6 networking.
Summary of Findings
- Missing DAD check before gateway check: The original code performed a DAD check after the gateway check, which is not ideal. The DAD check should be performed before any network operations that rely on the IPv6 address being valid and unique. This change moves the DAD check to before the gateway check, ensuring that the IPv6 address is valid before proceeding with gateway readiness checks.
- IPv6 address state verification: The code now includes a function
waitIPv6AddressPreferred
that verifies the state of IPv6 addresses on an interface. This function checks for deprecated, DAD failed, or tentative addresses, ensuring that only preferred addresses are used. This adds robustness to IPv6 networking configurations. - E2E test for IPv6 connectivity: An end-to-end test has been added to verify IPv6 connectivity to node IPs when a pod starts immediately. This test ensures that IPv6 networking is functioning correctly in the cluster.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is almost ready for merging. The changes address an important aspect of IPv6 networking and include a new end-to-end test. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. There are no critical or high severity issues, but I recommend addressing the medium severity issue before merging.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 14482711274Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Signed-off-by: clyi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: clyi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: clyi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: clyi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: clyi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: clyi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: clyi <[email protected]>
Pull Request
What type of this PR
Examples of user facing changes:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes
Fixes #(issue-number)