Skip to content

kubectl-ko: replace endpoint with endpointslice#5425

Merged
zhangzujian merged 1 commit intokubeovn:masterfrom
zhangzujian:fix-ko-ep
Jul 3, 2025
Merged

kubectl-ko: replace endpoint with endpointslice#5425
zhangzujian merged 1 commit intokubeovn:masterfrom
zhangzujian:fix-ko-ep

Conversation

@zhangzujian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Pull Request

What type of this PR

Examples of user facing changes:

  • Features
  • Bug fixes
  • Docs
  • Tests

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Warning: v1 Endpoints is deprecated in v1.33+; use discovery.k8s.io/v1 EndpointSlice
ovn-nb leader check ok
Warning: v1 Endpoints is deprecated in v1.33+; use discovery.k8s.io/v1 EndpointSlice
ovn-sb leader check ok
Warning: v1 Endpoints is deprecated in v1.33+; use discovery.k8s.io/v1 EndpointSlice
ovn-northd leader check ok

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 3, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @zhangzujian, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the kubectl-ko utility script to migrate from the deprecated Kubernetes Endpoints API to the more modern EndpointSlice API. This change resolves deprecation warnings and ensures the script's continued functionality for checking OVN component leaders in Kubernetes environments.

Highlights

  • API Deprecation Fix: The kubectl-ko script has been updated to replace the deprecated v1 Endpoints API with the discovery.k8s.io/v1 EndpointSlice API. This addresses deprecation warnings and ensures future compatibility.
  • Leader Check Logic Update: The checkLeader function within dist/images/kubectl-ko now uses kubectl get endpointslice with a jsonpath query to correctly identify and count leader instances for OVN components (ovn-nb, ovn-sb, ovn-northd), adapting to the new EndpointSlice structure.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request replaces the deprecated Endpoints API with EndpointSlice for leader checks in the kubectl-ko script. The change improves compatibility with newer Kubernetes versions. The review focuses on ensuring the checkLeader function accurately counts active endpoints.

component="$1"; shift
set +o pipefail
count=$(kubectl get ep ovn-$component -n $KUBE_OVN_NS -o yaml | grep "ip:" | wc -l)
count=$(kubectl get endpointslice -l kubernetes.io/service-name=ovn-$component -n $KUBE_OVN_NS -o jsonpath='{.items[*].endpoints[*].addresses[0]}' | sort | uniq | wc -l)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The current jsonpath command only retrieves the first address of each endpoint, which can lead to an inaccurate count of active endpoints. This can cause the leader election to fail if multiple endpoints are present but only one address is retrieved.[^1]

count=$(kubectl get endpointslice -l kubernetes.io/service-name=ovn-$component -n $KUBE_OVN_NS -o go-template='{{len .items}}')

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16044421755

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.004%) to 21.561%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 16044085466: 0.004%
Covered Lines: 10512
Relevant Lines: 48754

💛 - Coveralls

@zhangzujian zhangzujian requested a review from oilbeater July 3, 2025 08:01
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jul 3, 2025
@zhangzujian zhangzujian merged commit 489b1eb into kubeovn:master Jul 3, 2025
72 of 75 checks passed
@zhangzujian zhangzujian deleted the fix-ko-ep branch July 3, 2025 09:37
zhangzujian added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer need backport size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants