e2e: fix OOM on ginkgo build#6217
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @zhangzujian, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request primarily focuses on resolving an Out Of Memory (OOM) issue that was affecting the Ginkgo end-to-end test build process. The solution involves a strategic change in how the e2e test suites are compiled, breaking down a monolithic build command into individual executions to reduce memory footprint. Concurrently, a comprehensive update of various Go module dependencies has been performed to ensure the project's libraries are current and stable. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 21398664771Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates dependencies in go.mod and go.sum to address potential OOM issues during Ginkgo builds. The updates involve upgrading several indirect dependencies to newer versions. I have identified some opportunities to improve the code changes and have added review comments accordingly.
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/k8s-network | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/kube-ovn | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/ovn-ic | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/multus | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/non-primary-cni | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/lb-svc | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/vip | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/vpc-egress-gateway | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/iptables-vpc-nat-gw | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/ovn-vpc-nat-gw | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/ha | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/security | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/kubevirt | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/webhook | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/connectivity | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/metallb | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/anp-domain | ||
| $(GINKGO_E2E_BUILD) ./test/e2e/cnp-domain | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The e2e-build target is now splitting the execution of GINKGO_E2E_BUILD into multiple lines. While this might improve readability, it could potentially increase the build time due to the overhead of invoking GINKGO_E2E_BUILD multiple times. Consider whether this change introduces a noticeable performance impact.
Signed-off-by: zhangzujian <zhangzujian.7@gmail.com>
Pull Request
What type of this PR
Examples of user facing changes:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes
Fixes #(issue-number)