Skip to content

Conversation

@zeb33n
Copy link
Contributor

@zeb33n zeb33n commented Sep 8, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Fixes a bug where the parser would return an empty Document instead of an error if the peer in the top level relationship was not present in the document.

e.g
bom document outline example.spdx now outputs

FATA opening doc: unable to find peer object with SPDXID doesnt-exist 

instead of

               _      
 ___ _ __   __| |_  __
/ __| '_ \ / _` \ \/ /
\__ \ |_) | (_| |>  < 
|___/ .__/ \__,_/_/\_\
    |_|               

 📂 SPDX Document SBOM-SPDX-c6d8b3cc-b41b-4ce9-9e5f-ce24616b7fbe
  │ 
  │ 📦 DESCRIBES 0 Packages
  │ 
  └ 📄 DESCRIBES 0 Files



for the document.

SPDXID: SPDXRef-DOCUMENT

##### Package: nginx

PackageName: nginx
SPDXID: SPDXRef-nginx

##### Package: python 

PackageName: python
SPDXID: SPDXRef-python

Relationship: SPDXRef-nginx CONTAINS SPDXRef-Python
Relationship: SPDXRef-DOCUMENT DESCRIBES doesnt-exist

Note: to repeat this the document needs at least 2 layers of relationships otherwise the elements are added to the document as leaf nodes.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Fatal error now encountered when attempting to parse a document with a malformed top level relationship. 

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Sep 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zeb33n
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign saschagrunert for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @zeb33n. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 8, 2025
@zeb33n zeb33n changed the title Zeb/top level item fix top level relationship fix Sep 9, 2025
@zeb33n
Copy link
Contributor Author

zeb33n commented Oct 20, 2025

hey @cpanato @puerco If you have the time, I would appreciate your feedback here please.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants