Skip to content

🌱 test(api): cover additionalTags keys with spaces#5985

Open
alliasgher wants to merge 1 commit into
kubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
alliasgher:fix-tag-key-space-test
Open

🌱 test(api): cover additionalTags keys with spaces#5985
alliasgher wants to merge 1 commit into
kubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
alliasgher:fix-tag-key-space-test

Conversation

@alliasgher

@alliasgher alliasgher commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

The existing no errors - spaces allowed test in api/v1beta1/tags_test.go and api/v1beta2/tags_test.go only exercises a tag value containing a space ({"validKey": "valid Value"}). Keys with spaces — the actual scenario reported in #4642 (e.g. Patch Group: nopatch) — are not covered, even though the regex ^[a-zA-Z0-9\s\_\.\:\=\+\-\@\/]*$ is meant to allow them.

This PR adds a regression case that uses "Patch Group" as the key in both v1beta1 and v1beta2 test tables, so future regex churn cannot silently re-break this scenario.

The actual validation regex was fixed in commit 4b69599 (Sept 2022) and ships in all currently supported v2.x releases, so no production code change is needed; this is just locking down the behaviour.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #4642

Special notes for your reviewer:

I verified the regex behaviour manually and via the new test cases — both v1beta1 and v1beta2 Tags.Validate() accept keys with spaces today.

AI Usage:
Used Claude to summarise the regex history and draft the test cases; verified by running go test ./api/v1beta1/ ./api/v1beta2/ -run TestTagsValidate locally.

NONE

Existing 'spaces allowed' test only verifies a tag *value* with a space;
the key path is not exercised. Add a regression case for keys with
spaces ("Patch Group") in both v1beta1 and v1beta2 so future regex
churn cannot silently break the case from kubernetes-sigs#4642 again.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Apr 25, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign richardcase for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Welcome @alliasgher!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 25, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @alliasgher. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 25, 2026
@alliasgher alliasgher changed the title test(api): cover additionalTags keys with spaces 🌱 test(api): cover additionalTags keys with spaces Apr 25, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Apr 25, 2026
@richardcase

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. needs-priority ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

additionalTags with whitespace in the key

3 participants