fix: create/update event generation for webhook provider

[tommasopozzetti]

What does it do ?

This commit adds preservation of refObject for records around the JSON serialization and deserialization of the record objects when calling AdjustEndpoints for a webhook provider.

Motivation

Fixes: #6359

More

• Yes, this PR title follows Conventional Commits
• Yes, I added unit tests
• Yes, I updated end user documentation accordingly

[k8s-ci-robot]

Keywords which can automatically close issues and hashtag(#) mentions are not allowed in commit messages.

The list of commits with invalid commit messages:

• 089233e Fix create/update event generation for webhook provider

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign szuecs for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @tommasopozzetti!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/external-dns 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/external-dns has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @tommasopozzetti. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[ivankatliarchuk]

/ok-to-test

[coveralls]

Coverage Report for CI Build 24217234850

Coverage increased (+0.007%) to 80.535%

Details

• Coverage increased (+0.007%) from the base build.
• Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.
• 8 coverage regressions across 2 files.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

8 previously-covered lines in 2 files lost coverage.

File	Lines Losing Coverage	Coverage
webhook/webhook.go	7	89.11%
openshift_route.go	1	82.93%

---

Coverage Stats

Relevant Lines:	21320
Covered Lines:	17170
Line Coverage:	80.53%
Coverage Strength:	1470.53 hits per line

---

💛 - Coveralls

[ivankatliarchuk]

the merge commit format is not supported