Skip to content

feat(gateway): decoupled DNS hostname from listener hostname via annotation-only - #6612

Open
cleman95 wants to merge 1 commit into
kubernetes-sigs:masterfrom
cleman95:feature/gateway-api-annotation-hostname-source
Open

feat(gateway): decoupled DNS hostname from listener hostname via annotation-only#6612
cleman95 wants to merge 1 commit into
kubernetes-sigs:masterfrom
cleman95:feature/gateway-api-annotation-hostname-source

Conversation

@cleman95

@cleman95 cleman95 commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What does it do ?

When external-dns.kubernetes.io/gateway-hostname-source: annotation-only is set on a Route, ExternalDNS now creates DNS records from the annotation hostname (external-dns.kubernetes.io/hostname) using the parent Gateway's IP address, without requiring the annotation hostname to match the listener hostname.
Previously, matchRouteToListener required gwMatchingHost(listenerHostname, routeHostname) to return true before any endpoints were generated. When the annotation hostname differed from the listener hostname, the route was silently skipped, the gateway-hostname-source: annotation-only annotation was never effectively evaluated.

Motivation

Fixes #6594
The Ingress source already supports decoupling DNS hostname from routing hostname via external-dns.kubernetes.io/ingress-hostname-source: annotation-only, which creates a DNS record for any hostname in the annotation regardless of the Ingress spec host. The Gateway API source lacked this capability, making the following migration pattern impossible:

  1. Listener routes traffic on mywebsite.example.com
  2. ExternalDNS creates a DNS record for mywebsite.gtw.prod.example.com (in a zone managed by RFC2136)
  3. An external CNAME (mywebsite.example.com → mywebsite.gtw.prod.example.com) is managed by a different DNS provider
    This pattern is common during Ingress → Gateway API migrations where the DNS zone managed by external-dns doesn't cover the routing hostname's parent zone, or where a CNAME chain exists between an externally-managed hostname and the RFC2136 zone.

More

  • Yes, this PR title follows Conventional Commits
  • Yes, I added unit tests
  • Yes, I updated end user documentation accordingly

The existing docs/sources/gateway-api.md already documents the gateway-hostname-source annotation. The behavior change (bypassing listener hostname matching in annotation-only mode) could be noted there. Let me know if you'd like me to update it.

@kubernetes-prow
kubernetes-prow Bot requested review from u-kai and vflaux August 3, 2026 21:19
@kubernetes-prow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign vflaux for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubernetes-prow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Welcome @cleman95!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/external-dns 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/external-dns has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@kubernetes-prow kubernetes-prow Bot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 3, 2026
@kubernetes-prow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @cleman95. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Tip

We noticed you've done this a few times! Consider joining the org to skip this step and gain /lgtm and other bot rights. We recommend asking approvers on your previous PRs to sponsor you.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kubernetes-prow kubernetes-prow Bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. source

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Gateway API source: support decoupled DNS hostname from listener hostname via annotations (consistent with Ingress source)

1 participant