-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 188
Add benchmarking folder #1689
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add benchmarking folder #1689
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for gateway-api-inference-extension ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
Hi @rlakhtakia. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/ok-to-test Thanks! Looks good! Do you mind splitting this up a bit? And is this looks like a helm chart we are defining for benchmarking, which is great! Have we talked to the inference-perf folks to see if they want to use this? |
|
@rlakhtakia thanks for the contribution. Do you have any updates regarding #1689 (comment)? |
eeda363 to
fad75e6
Compare
|
Blocked until kubernetes-sigs/inference-perf#264. |
All should be updated however remote repo is still not available. |
5859d89 to
2b5028b
Compare
|
Added a temp chart to not be blocked further on this. #1815 will track cleaning this up once the remote is available. |
|
/unhold |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kfswain, rlakhtakia The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm |
|
/lgtm |
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
#1688