-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add requirement keys of KWOK instance offerings to well-known labels #2053
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -139,6 +139,13 @@ func setDefaultOptions(opts InstanceTypeOptions) InstanceTypeOptions { | |||||||||||||||||
v1alpha1.InstanceCPULabelKey: cpu, | ||||||||||||||||||
v1alpha1.InstanceMemoryLabelKey: memory, | ||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||
for _, offering := range opts.Offerings { | ||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm a little confused by this update -- what is this trying to achieve? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I originally thought this was needed to get the labels added onto the resulting |
||||||||||||||||||
for _, req := range offering.Requirements { | ||||||||||||||||||
if _, exists := opts.instanceTypeLabels[req.Key]; !exists { | ||||||||||||||||||
opts.instanceTypeLabels[req.Key] = req.Values[0] | ||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
// if the user specified a different pod limit, override the default | ||||||||||||||||||
opts.Resources = lo.Assign(corev1.ResourceList{ | ||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -169,6 +176,12 @@ func newInstanceType(options InstanceTypeOptions) *cloudprovider.InstanceType { | |||||||||||||||||
return req.Values | ||||||||||||||||||
}))) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
for _, offering := range options.Offerings { | ||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It's not just offering requirements, right? It's also the instance type requirements in general? I think we need both There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not sure I'm familiar enough to fully follow; just pushed a commit now to add requirements from both karpenter/kwok/cloudprovider/helpers.go Lines 172 to 179 in ee215df
Is this what you mean or something else? |
||||||||||||||||||
for _, requirement := range offering.Requirements { | ||||||||||||||||||
v1.WellKnownLabels = v1.WellKnownLabels.Insert(requirement.Key) | ||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
requirements := scheduling.NewRequirements( | ||||||||||||||||||
scheduling.NewRequirement(corev1.LabelInstanceTypeStable, corev1.NodeSelectorOpIn, options.Name), | ||||||||||||||||||
scheduling.NewRequirement(corev1.LabelArchStable, corev1.NodeSelectorOpIn, options.Architecture), | ||||||||||||||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this bit means we can drop some of the static things that we are setting around zone and capacity type below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, removed the explicit zone/capacity-type in ee215df