Skip to content

Copy periodic test-infra tests into scripts#965

Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
LogicalShark:periodics-copy
Feb 11, 2026
Merged

Copy periodic test-infra tests into scripts#965
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
LogicalShark:periodics-copy

Conversation

@LogicalShark
Copy link
Contributor

Analogous to https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-gcp/pull/917/changes
Test scripts from https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/master/config/jobs/kubernetes/cloud-provider-gcp/cloud-provider-gcp-periodics.yaml
The config will remain in test-infra and will call these scripts. They will be updated soon to replace bazel with kops.

Signed-off-by: LogicalShark <maralder@google.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Feb 4, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If the repository mantainers determine this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Feb 4, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @LogicalShark. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 4, 2026
@LogicalShark LogicalShark marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2026 21:32
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 5, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from cheftako February 5, 2026 21:32
@elmiko
Copy link
Contributor

elmiko commented Feb 10, 2026

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 10, 2026
@elmiko
Copy link
Contributor

elmiko commented Feb 10, 2026

/lgtm

i can't imagine this will trip the tests.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 10, 2026
@elmiko
Copy link
Contributor

elmiko commented Feb 10, 2026

it looks like some expectation in the tests has changed and now a VPC value is not as expected. i can't see where this might originate in the scripts.

@elmiko
Copy link
Contributor

elmiko commented Feb 10, 2026

/unlgtm until we figure this out.

@elmiko
Copy link
Contributor

elmiko commented Feb 10, 2026

/lgtm cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 10, 2026
@LogicalShark
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

I think this test is flaky

@YifeiZhuang
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 11, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: LogicalShark, YifeiZhuang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 11, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 65ef289 into kubernetes:master Feb 11, 2026
7 checks passed
@YifeiZhuang
Copy link
Contributor

replaces #917 cc. @justinsb

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants