Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
cncf-cla: yes
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: zylxjtu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
approved
|
Can you update the PR description to say |
|
/assign @aravindhp |
|
/lgtm |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
sig-windows/annual-report-2025.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| - Stable | ||
| - [5100 - DSR and Overlay support in Windows kube-proxy](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-windows/5100-windows-dsr-and-overlay-support) - v1.34 --> | ||
| - [2258 - Node log query](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-windows/2258-node-log-query) - v1.33 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Node log query is still in beta.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry I should have been more clear. Node log query needs to be removed from the report as it went to beta in 2024.
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
lgtm
sig-windows/annual-report-2025.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| - Stable | ||
| - [5100 - DSR and Overlay support in Windows kube-proxy](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-windows/5100-windows-dsr-and-overlay-support) - v1.34 --> | ||
| - [2258 - Node log query](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-windows/2258-node-log-query) - v1.33 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry I should have been more clear. Node log query needs to be removed from the report as it went to beta in 2024.
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
/cc @BenTheElder |
|
|
||
| 2. Are there any areas and/or subprojects that your group needs help with (e.g. fewer than 2 active OWNERS)? | ||
|
|
||
| No |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nothing? This is an opportunity to highlight where you might benefit from additional contributors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a good call out @BenTheElder. The problem within sig-windows is not with OWNERS but lack of help outside of the list of OWNERS. I think what is happening with the question is the focus is going to towards the OWNERS file and nothing else.
I know I am transitioning away from sig-windows but @zylxjtu we should follow up on @BenTheElder comment add some verbiage on the areas where we need help.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, OWNERS is just an example suggestion, but the question is meant to be completely general: Where does the SIG need help? This is meant to be an opportunity to increase visibility on e.g. staffing gaps beyond just active approvers.
6 participants
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #8781