SIG-Scheduling annual report 2025#8824
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
area/annual-reports
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sanposhiho The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
sig/scheduling
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
cncf-cla: yes
| - [ ] [CONTRIBUTING.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed | ||
| - [x] [README.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed | ||
| - [x] [CONTRIBUTING.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed | ||
| - [ ] Other contributing docs (e.g. in devel dir or contributor guide) reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have an issue, but couldn't work on that until now..
#8289
Co-authored-by: Dominik Marciński <gmidon@gmail.com>
|
|
||
| 2. Are there any areas and/or subprojects that your group needs help with (e.g. fewer than 2 active OWNERS)? | ||
|
|
||
| - [scheduler-plugins](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins/) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Huang-Wei I put scheduler-plugins here, unless you don't think we shuold?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yup, it's good to put it here. For current phase, we're short of active maintainers but overall it's good - I do regular release cuttings.
Probably when Workload becomes the atomic scheduling unit, scheduler-plugins will become more active, and let's evaluate how to engage more active maintainers by then.
| 2. Are there any areas and/or subprojects that your group needs help with (e.g. fewer than 2 active OWNERS)? | ||
|
|
||
| - [scheduler-plugins](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins/) | ||
| - [kwok](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kwok) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@wzshiming
I put kwok here, unless you don't think we should?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cc @elmiko who may have some thoughts and/or referrals of folks who could help out
| - New Chairs and Tech leads | ||
|
|
||
| 2. Are there any areas and/or subprojects that your group needs help with (e.g. fewer than 2 active OWNERS)? | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should I put cluster-capacity?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cluster capacity has been in the maintenance mode for some time. K8s rebases only. There are currently no new features on our roadmap. The current maintenance capacity is sufficient. Thank you for asking.
|
Content lgtm |
|
/hold once you're ready |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
7 participants
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #8776
/cc @macsko @dom4ha @BenTheElder