Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow filtering request handling dashboard on exported_namespace #10052

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

deepy
Copy link

@deepy deepy commented Jun 7, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:

The request handling dashboard is great but gets messy if you're deploying the same application in multiple namespaces and you're not able to change the name of the ingress resource
In my case I have ingresses named after their application in multiple namespaces, i.e. httpbin-ingress might exist in the namespaceshttpbin-prod, httpbin-staging and httpbin-dev
This PR adds namespace as a variable for filtering to allow you to narrow down the data prevented in the dashboard further

namespace

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • CVE Report (Scanner found CVE and adding report)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation only

How Has This Been Tested?

I've tested this on grafana cloud, and on a Grafana instance created following the ingress-nginx documentation

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTION guide
  • I have added unit and/or e2e tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jun 7, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: deepy / name: Alex Nordlund (e514c2f)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from cpanato and puerco June 7, 2023 13:44
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 7, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @deepy!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @deepy. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 7, 2023
@longwuyuan
Copy link
Contributor

longwuyuan commented Jun 7, 2023 via email

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 7, 2023
@deepy
Copy link
Author

deepy commented Jun 7, 2023

Done

@longwuyuan
Copy link
Contributor

longwuyuan commented Jun 7, 2023 via email

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 7, 2023
@longwuyuan
Copy link
Contributor

longwuyuan commented Jun 7, 2023 via email

@tao12345666333
Copy link
Member

Thanks, let me take a look

@tao12345666333
Copy link
Member

/assign

@tao12345666333
Copy link
Member

As an extra note, can you add information about your test environment to the description? This saves a lot of time.

if you're deploying the same application in multiple namespaces

I noticed your sentence, please add information to avoid my misunderstanding, thanks

@deepy
Copy link
Author

deepy commented Jun 7, 2023

I'll add another line to clarify that one, but in essence if you have two ingress with the same name but in different namespaces
The dashboards will correctly show the hostname, but if I have more than 10 ingresses that may be too much data to consume easily

@tao12345666333
Copy link
Member

So your point is, as long as I deploy ingress-controllers with the same name in different namespaces and collect their metrics, I can perform verification, right?

@tao12345666333
Copy link
Member

Maybe I misunderstood, are you referring to Ingress resources instead of ingress-controller?

To make it clearer, could you please list the verification steps directly?

@deepy
Copy link
Author

deepy commented Jun 7, 2023

Yes, this is only for the request handling dashboard, i.e. not for the controller itself.

Easiest way to test this is to create two namespaces, prod and dev and create an ingress resource called httpbin in both
Service Ingress variable in the dashboard will show a single ingress (httpbin) and Ingress Namespace variable will show two (prod and dev)

@github-actions
Copy link

This is stale, but we won't close it automatically, just bare in mind the maintainers may be busy with other tasks and will reach your issue ASAP. If you have any question or request to prioritize this, please reach #ingress-nginx-dev on Kubernetes Slack.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Jul 24, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The lifecycle/frozen label can not be applied to PRs.

This bot removes lifecycle/frozen from PRs because:

  • Commenting /lifecycle frozen on a PR has not worked since March 2021
  • PRs that remain open for >150 days are unlikely to be easily rebased

You can:

  • Rebase this PR and attempt to get it merged
  • Close this PR with /close

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/remove-lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Jan 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 2, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@rikatz
Copy link
Contributor

rikatz commented Aug 22, 2024

/lgtm
/approve

Please rebase and we shall get this merged.
Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepy, rikatz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@deepy: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pre-ingress-nginx-lua-test e514c2f link true /test pre-ingress-nginx-lua-test
pre-ingress-nginx-codegen e514c2f link true /test pre-ingress-nginx-codegen
pre-ingress-nginx-boilerplate e514c2f link true /test pre-ingress-nginx-boilerplate

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants