Skip to content

fix(openstack): determine ports to delete based on tags #16961

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ederst
Copy link
Contributor

@ederst ederst commented Nov 26, 2024

This will determine the ports to delete when deleting an InstanceGroup in OpenStack based on the tags, rather than comparing the prefix of the name of the port to a pattern.

The current approach for deleting ports associated with an InstanceGroup in OpenStack can be problematic.

For example, when creating an InstanceGroup called worker and another one called worker-2. Some of the ports kOps creates for those groups will look like this:

  • port-worker-2-1-<clusterName>
  • port-worker-2-2-<clusterName>
  • port-worker-1-<clusterName>
  • port-worker-2-<clusterName>
  • port-worker-20-<clusterName>

Deleting the worker-2 IG will ultimately delete all the ports prefixed with port-worker-2, which means that kOps will also delete ports of the worker IG.

TODO:

  • Write tests

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 26, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ederst. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. area/provider/openstack Issues or PRs related to openstack provider size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 26, 2024
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Nov 27, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 27, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 20, 2025
@ederst ederst force-pushed the delete-ports-based-on-tags branch from 33c6fd3 to 2bf02c5 Compare April 24, 2025 09:08
@ederst ederst marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2025 09:08
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign olemarkus for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ederst
Copy link
Contributor Author

ederst commented Apr 24, 2025

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 24, 2025
@ederst ederst changed the title WIP: fix(openstack): determine ports to delete based on tags fix(openstack): determine ports to delete based on tags Apr 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from hakman April 24, 2025 09:09
@ederst ederst force-pushed the delete-ports-based-on-tags branch from 2bf02c5 to 6344657 Compare April 24, 2025 09:10
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Apr 24, 2025

@ederst: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kops-e2e-cni-flannel 33c6fd3 link true /test pull-kops-e2e-cni-flannel
pull-kops-e2e-gce-cni-calico 33c6fd3 link true /test pull-kops-e2e-gce-cni-calico
pull-kops-e2e-gce-cni-kindnet 33c6fd3 link true /test pull-kops-e2e-gce-cni-kindnet
pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-amazonvpc-u2404 33c6fd3 link true /test pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-amazonvpc-u2404

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ederst
Copy link
Contributor Author

ederst commented Apr 29, 2025

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/provider/openstack Issues or PRs related to openstack provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants