kubernetes-ci-images => k8s-staging-ci-images

[BobyMCbobs]

Promote use of k8s-staging-ci-images.

Related: kubernetes/k8s.io#1460

[hasheddan]

/lgtm

These are deprecated build jobs, but probably good to go ahead and move them over as well. Thanks @BobyMCbobs!

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BobyMCbobs, hasheddan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-release/OWNERS [hasheddan]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[justaugustus]

/hold
/lgtm cancel

[hasheddan]

Oh just realized these are to hold over until the switch is complete. Thanks @justaugustus !

[hasheddan]

I wonder if it would make sense to remove this job with the release of a new version (e.g. v1.21) so that consumers will break when they consume a new version of k8s. This wouldn't really make a difference for folks consuming version markers, but it would provide a tangible cut-off at which support was dropped, rather than dropping support across all active releases at a given time.

[justaugustus]

Oh just realized these are to hold over until the switch is complete. Thanks @justaugustus !

Yep! These jobs were marked as deprecated in #20964.

As part of kubernetes/release#1711 (using krel for CI builds), #20663 set the krel ci-build as the de facto CI build.

Let's hang tight for Aaron to provide feedback on what he wànts next steps to be.

/assign @spiffxp

EDIT:
I'm thinking a few things:

• build consumers use the new community version markers
• once completed, these jobs get removed

[alvaroaleman]

@BobyMCbobs: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[BobyMCbobs]

Rebased now, @alvaroaleman

[cpanato]

@hasheddan @justaugustus this is something we still want to move? what are the blockers to merge this PR? there is anything that I can help to unblock this?

[spiffxp]

/close
Deprecated jobs need to keep pushing to the deprecated locations.

Closure would look like:

• announcing to the community that use of CI artifacts from kubernetes-ci-images and gs://kubernetes-release-dev is deprecated, with a deprecation window
• dropping all use of the deprecated artifacts across the project
• removing these deprecated build jobs after the deprecation window

It might be worth a KEP to enumerate the full scope of changes required, if not some iteration over a proposal or umbrella issue

ref: kubernetes/k8s.io#846
ref: kubernetes/k8s.io#1460

[k8s-ci-robot]

@spiffxp: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close
Deprecated jobs need to keep pushing to the deprecated locations.

Closure would look like:

• announcing to the community that use of CI artifacts from kubernetes-ci-images and gs://kubernetes-release-dev is deprecated, with a deprecation window
• dropping all use of the deprecated artifacts across the project
• removing these deprecated build jobs after the deprecation window

It might be worth a KEP to enumerate the full scope of changes required, if not some iteration over a proposal or umbrella issue

ref: kubernetes/k8s.io#846
ref: kubernetes/k8s.io#1460

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.