Skip to content

Clarify whether CRDs are cluster scoped in multitenancy page #48156

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions content/en/docs/concepts/security/multi-tenancy.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -422,8 +422,7 @@ Priority and Fairness, is also recommended.

Namespace isolation is well-supported by Kubernetes, has a negligible resource cost, and provides
mechanisms to allow tenants to interact appropriately, such as by allowing service-to-service
communication. However, it can be difficult to configure, and doesn't apply to Kubernetes
resources that can't be namespaced, such as Custom Resource Definitions, Storage Classes, and Webhooks.
communication. However, it can be difficult to configure, and it doesn't apply to resources that are cluster-scoped and not namespaced, such as Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs) themselves (though the custom resources they define can be namespaced), Storage Classes, and Webhooks.

Control plane virtualization allows for isolation of non-namespaced resources at the cost of
somewhat higher resource usage and more difficult cross-tenant sharing. It is a good option when
Expand Down