MCP-OCP-Lightspeed#894
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
@yaacov ptal |
|
@Jenny-Anne hi, Screencast.From.2026-04-16.20-38-38.mp4 |
|
note: the user will not need to install anything, it will be installed automatically by our MTV controller in clusters that have Lightspeed installed ** before ** we install MTV (*). (*) we didn't iron out this yet, we may solve this issue before release, or may not, installing lightspeed is a very complicated task, if we bring an expert that can install lightspeed, they can easily go over the manual install proccess and add the MTV support while they install Lightspeed |
Jenny-Anne
force-pushed
the
MTV-2749-mcp-ocp-lightspeed
branch
from
23cc0d8 to
b1fbe4c
Compare
|
A clip showing installing the MCP feature: Clip ( note that it can take some time for lightspeed to load the new MCP, you can fast forward the clip ): Screen.Recording.2026-04-24.at.8.34.47.mov |
Jenny-Anne
force-pushed
the
MTV-2749-mcp-ocp-lightspeed
branch
from
b1fbe4c to
c1f5246
Compare
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds Red Hat OpenShift Lightspeed docs: product attributes, a planning assembly and master include, a concept module, an enablement procedure, AI-assisted troubleshooting steps, and a new troubleshooting procedure referenced in the migration troubleshooting assembly. ChangesLightspeed documentation cohort
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User as Console User
participant Console as OCP Web Console
participant Lightspeed as Lightspeed Service
participant Forklift as ForkliftController CR
participant MCP as MCP Server
participant Cluster as Cluster Data (CRs, Logs)
User->>Console: Open Lightspeed chat & ask migration question
Console->>Lightspeed: Forward query with user context
Lightspeed->>Forklift: Read feature flag / registration state
Lightspeed->>MCP: Request real-time cluster data
MCP->>Cluster: Collect plans, CRs, logs
Cluster-->>MCP: Return diagnostics
MCP-->>Lightspeed: Provide context and logs
Lightspeed-->>Console: Reply with diagnosis & remediation (RBAC-aware)
Console-->>User: Display assistant response
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@documentation/modules/proc_enabling-lightspeed-integration.adoc`:
- Around line 25-27: Replace the hardcoded strings in the
proc_enabling-lightspeed-integration.adoc content: change the literal namespace
"konveyor-forklift" to use the shared namespace attribute (e.g., {namespace})
and replace the operator label "Forklift Operator" with a reusable attribute
(e.g., {operator_label} or the attribute defined in
documentation/modules/common-attributes.adoc); update the two lines that contain
"konveyor-forklift" and "Forklift Operator" so they reference those attributes
instead of hardcoded text and ensure the attribute names match what's declared
in common-attributes.adoc.
In `@documentation/modules/proc_using-lightspeed-troubleshooting.adoc`:
- Around line 19-23: Replace the hardcoded "2.12" and any fixed-version URLs
with documentation attributes/xrefs so the prerequisites and link stay correct
across releases: change the literal "2.12" to a version attribute (e.g.,
{product-version} or {product-major-minor}) wherever it appears, and convert the
hardcoded link:https://.../2.12/...[...] to an attribute-based or xref-style
reference (e.g., link:{doc-base}/{product-version}/...[...] or
xref:enabling-lightspeed-integration[Enabling the {lightspeed-full}
integration]) so the text and the "Enabling the {lightspeed-full} integration"
link resolve dynamically instead of pointing to a fixed 2.12 URL.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: beb57a6f-1fd2-4184-8d71-c363fa9891f0
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
documentation/doc-Migrating_your_virtual_machines/assemblies/assembly_troubleshooting-migration.adocdocumentation/doc-Planning_your_migration/assemblies/assembly_lightspeed-integration.adocdocumentation/doc-Planning_your_migration/master.adocdocumentation/modules/common-attributes.adocdocumentation/modules/con_using-lightspeed-with-mtv.adocdocumentation/modules/proc_enabling-lightspeed-integration.adocdocumentation/modules/proc_troubleshooting-workflow.adocdocumentation/modules/proc_using-lightspeed-troubleshooting.adocdocumentation/upstream-attributes.adoc
Resolved conflict in assembly_troubleshooting-migration.adoc by: - Keeping the Lightspeed troubleshooting procedure include - Using the renamed ref_common-migration-issues.adoc (from con_) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@documentation/modules/con_using-lightspeed-with-mtv.adoc`:
- Line 63: Update the documentation text that references the ForkliftController
CR to use the finalized feature flag key feature_lightspeed_integration instead
of feature_mcp_server; change the sentence on line 63 to state that the operator
configures Lightspeed when feature_lightspeed_integration is enabled and note
that it is disabled by setting the value to "off", and propagate this corrected
key to any linked procedures or examples that set the ForkliftController spec so
users modify the correct CR field.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 54e16247-1477-47d8-b15f-cd959434c7c4
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
documentation/doc-Migrating_your_virtual_machines/assemblies/assembly_troubleshooting-migration.adocdocumentation/modules/common-attributes.adocdocumentation/modules/con_using-lightspeed-with-mtv.adocdocumentation/modules/proc_enabling-lightspeed-integration.adocdocumentation/modules/proc_troubleshooting-workflow.adocdocumentation/upstream-attributes.adoc
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- documentation/doc-Migrating_your_virtual_machines/assemblies/assembly_troubleshooting-migration.adoc
- documentation/modules/proc_enabling-lightspeed-integration.adoc
yaacov
left a comment
yaacov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm
np: i am not we are clear it's an AI too, with all the inherent security risks shared by all AI tools ( e.g. you may be sending your information to an external AI service provider )
Thanks @yaacov Added this note: When using Lightspeed with an external AI service provider, cluster information, logs, and resource details may be transmitted to that provider. Evaluate whether external AI services align with the security and compliance requirements of your organization. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is great.
Just a few nits, but nothing to stop us merging
I do want to ask Carolyn to have a look. Not because of your work, but i want to make sure the "Lightspeed" usage has been signed off by legal and the correct naming is being used
thanks
Thanks. We have these three attributes in the attributes file, so we can update them if necessary. I'm not sure if we can use the short form Lightspeed or if it has to be OpenShift Lightspeed.
|
4 participants
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/MTV-2749
Previews:
Planning guide chapter on Lightspeed:
Red Hat OpenShift Lightspeed integration with MTV: https://forklift-documentation-git-fork-je-e9e16c-yaacov-8047s-projects.vercel.app/downstream/documentation/doc-Planning_your_migration/master.html#assembly_lightspeed-integration_mtv
Migrating guide troubleshooting topic for Lightspeed:
Using Red Hat OpenShift Lightspeed to troubleshoot migration issues: https://forklift-documentation-git-fork-je-e9e16c-yaacov-8047s-projects.vercel.app/downstream/documentation/doc-Migrating_your_virtual_machines/master.html#proc_using-lightspeed-troubleshooting_mtv
Summary by CodeRabbit