Skip to content

Conversation

@gouyang
Copy link
Member

@gouyang gouyang commented Feb 11, 2026

📝 Description

Add a brief description

🎥 Demo

Please add a video or an image of the behavior/changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Reorganized checkup verification tests by consolidating operations and removing redundant test cases.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 11, 2026

@gouyang: This pull request references CNV-77646 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

📝 Description

Add a brief description

🎥 Demo

Please add a video or an image of the behavior/changes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved This issue is something we want to fix label Feb 11, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 11, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A test case verifying network checkup page loading was removed from the Cypress test file. The storage checkup test was modified to include a cy.visitCheckups() call at its start, consolidating navigation logic within that test. Net result: 1 line added, 5 lines removed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Test Suite Consolidation
cypress/tests/gating/check-tab-yaml.cy.ts
Removed network checkup test case and added cy.visitCheckups() call to storage checkup test, merging navigation logic into a single test.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Suggested labels

lgtm

Suggested reviewers

  • rszwajko
  • upalatucci
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description is empty placeholder text with no substantive content addressing the required sections. Add a brief description explaining why the network checkup test was removed and provide a demo/screenshot if applicable.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: removing a network checkup test case from the test file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Member

@galkremer1 galkremer1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Passed code review, ready for merge label Feb 11, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 11, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: galkremer1, gouyang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 11, 2026

@gouyang: This pull request references CNV-77646 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

📝 Description

Add a brief description

🎥 Demo

Please add a video or an image of the behavior/changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
  • Reorganized checkup verification tests by consolidating operations and removing redundant test cases.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 27b3a10 into kubevirt-ui:main Feb 11, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved This issue is something we want to fix jira/valid-reference lgtm Passed code review, ready for merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants