Skip to content

github: Remove check-vep workflow from release-1.8-aie-nv#6

Merged
lyarwood merged 1 commit into
kubevirt:release-1.8-aie-nvfrom
lyarwood:remove-check-vep-workflow
Feb 27, 2026
Merged

github: Remove check-vep workflow from release-1.8-aie-nv#6
lyarwood merged 1 commit into
kubevirt:release-1.8-aie-nvfrom
lyarwood:remove-check-vep-workflow

Conversation

@lyarwood

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this PR does

It's failing as we don't have the same project secrets as kubevirt/kubevirt:

Run python automation/label-approved-veps.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/runner/work/kubevirt-aie/kubevirt-aie/automation/label-approved-veps.py", line 301, in <module>
    main()
    ~~~~^^
  File "/home/runner/work/kubevirt-aie/kubevirt-aie/automation/label-approved-veps.py", line 254, in main
    pr_body = get_pr_details()
  File "/home/runner/work/kubevirt-aie/kubevirt-aie/automation/label-approved-veps.py", line 61, in get_pr_details
    response.raise_for_status()
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.14.3/x64/lib/python3.14/site-packages/requests/models.py", line 1026, in raise_for_status
    raise HTTPError(http_error_msg, response=self)
requests.exceptions.HTTPError: 401 Client Error: Unauthorized for url: https://api.github.com/repos/kubevirt/kubevirt-aie/pulls/4
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

The workflow doesn't make sense on this branch so remove it.

References

Why we need it and why it was done in this way

The following tradeoffs were made:

The following alternatives were considered:

Links to places where the discussion took place:

Special notes for your reviewer

Checklist

This checklist is not enforcing, but it's a reminder of items that could be relevant to every PR.
Approvers are expected to review this list.

Release note

NONE

The workflow doesn't make sense on this branch so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Lee Yarwood <lyarwood@redhat.com>
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. labels Feb 27, 2026
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the sig/buildsystem Denotes an issue or PR that relates to changes in the build system. label Feb 27, 2026
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot requested a review from enp0s3 February 27, 2026 14:09
@fossedihelm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 27, 2026

@jean-edouard jean-edouard left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@kubevirt-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jean-edouard, lyarwood

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 27, 2026
@lyarwood lyarwood merged commit 6894aa5 into kubevirt:release-1.8-aie-nv Feb 27, 2026
5 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/buildsystem Denotes an issue or PR that relates to changes in the build system. size/M

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants