Skip to content

Bump kubevirtci #14674

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
kubevirt-bot merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2025
Merged

Bump kubevirtci #14674

kubevirt-bot merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2025

Conversation

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot commented May 8, 2025

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. size/XS sig/buildsystem Denotes an issue or PR that relates to changes in the build system. labels May 8, 2025
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot requested review from brianmcarey and enp0s3 May 8, 2025 23:19
@dosubot dosubot bot added the sig/ci Denotes an issue or PR as being related to sig-ci, marks changes to the CI system. label May 8, 2025
@kubevirt-bot
Bump kubevirtci
2b10017 
[2f84ba7 Automatic bump of CentOS Stream to latest](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1429)
[f667106 istio: Remove Multus settings from the default Istio config](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1422)

```release-note
NONE
```

Signed-off-by: kubevirt-bot <[email protected]>
brianmcarey
brianmcarey approved these changes May 9, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@brianmcarey brianmcarey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 9, 2025
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

kubevirt-bot commented May 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: brianmcarey

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 9, 2025
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

kubevirt-commenter-bot commented May 9, 2025

Required labels detected, running phase 2 presubmits:
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-windows2016
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-1.30-vgpu
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-sriov
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.32-ipv6-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.30-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.30-sig-storage
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.30-sig-compute
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.30-sig-operator
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.31-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.31-sig-storage
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.31-sig-compute
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.31-sig-operator

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit 64beaa2 into kubevirt:main May 9, 2025
38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@enp0s3 enp0s3 Awaiting requested review from enp0s3

1 more reviewer

@brianmcarey brianmcarey brianmcarey approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@brianmcarey brianmcarey

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/buildsystem Denotes an issue or PR that relates to changes in the build system. sig/ci Denotes an issue or PR as being related to sig-ci, marks changes to the CI system. size/XS

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kubevirt-bot @kubevirt-commenter-bot @brianmcarey